<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Science on ተeamraት</title><link>https://teamrat.me/tags/science/</link><description>Recent content in Science on ተeamraት</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 08:20:00 -0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://teamrat.me/tags/science/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>An Irony Worth Noting</title><link>https://teamrat.me/notes/2026-03-16-deluge/</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 08:20:00 -0800</pubDate><guid>https://teamrat.me/notes/2026-03-16-deluge/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;ldquo;Subduing the Deluge in Soil Science: What If Each Researcher Published Only One Paper Per Year?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/strong&gt; H.H. Janzen and P Baveye, &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.70296"&gt;European Journal of Soil Science 77(2), 2026&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The authors argue that limiting researchers to one peer-reviewed paper per year would amplify scientific merit, bolster peer review, and benefit researchers&amp;rsquo; mental health and creativity. The proposal is compelling — until one examines the publication record of the authors in the years immediately preceding this call for restraint. The cobbler, it seems, has many shoes.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>